[Bug testsuite/35126] dg-options in gcc.c-torture/execute ignored

2008-02-07 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-07 19:52 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20567 *** -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug testsuite/35126] dg-options in gcc.c-torture/execute ignored

2008-02-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-07 18:06 --- Sure. Confirmed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug testsuite/35126] dg-options in gcc.c-torture/execute ignored

2008-02-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-02-07 15:55 --- Can we move them into gcc.dg/torture? -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug testsuite/35126] dg-options in gcc.c-torture/execute ignored

2008-02-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-02-07 15:53 --- My point is those dg-options aren't applied to the testcases. We should either remove them or make sure that they are used. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug testsuite/35126] dg-options in gcc.c-torture/execute ignored

2008-02-07 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-02-07 15:44 --- (In reply to comment #0) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] testsuite]$ grep dg-options gcc.c-torture/execute/*.c > gcc.c-torture/execute/pr7284-1.c:/* { dg-options "-std=c89" } */ > gcc.c-torture/execute/wchar_t-1.c:/* { dg-options "-fi

[Bug testsuite/35126] dg-options in gcc.c-torture/execute ignored

2008-02-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-07 15:32 --- This is semi by designed, you can use gcc.dg/torture for this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35126