--- Comment #11 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-13 22:19 ---
Fixed, via documentation and workarounds.
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #10 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-01 16:22 ---
Subject: Bug 25352
Author: janis
Date: Thu Nov 1 16:22:36 2007
New Revision: 129823
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129823
Log:
gcc/
PR testsuite/25352
* doc/sourcebuild.texi (
--- Comment #9 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-15 17:47 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> My recommendations are to document, in the description of test directives in
> the GCC Internals manual, that xfail for dg-do is only honored for dg-do run
> and ignored for other keywords, r
--- Comment #8 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-11 00:51 ---
I had forgotten all about this. Today I checked to see how older versions of
DejaGnu and GCC tests handled xfail for dg-do keywords other than "run". I
only went back as far as GCC 3.0.4 and DejaGnu 1.4, but they als
--- Comment #7 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-10 17:44 ---
Ben, Janis,
Would you please offer an update on the status of this PR? I'm running into
another situation where I need to xfail a dg-do link, and due to the issues
discussed in this PR it doesn't work. Has dejagnu c
--- Comment #6 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-14 18:36 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Having GCC depend on a fix in
> DejaGnu would not be popular unless there were other compelling reasons to
> require people to upgrade. Thoughts?
If the breakage is in dejagnu, certainly a
--- Comment #5 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-14 18:17 ---
I've got an ugly fix that reaches up a couple of levels to get the variable
from the DejaGnu proc that records that the test should be xfailed. Ben
Elliston, who is a DejaGnu maintainer, says that 1.4.5 will be releas
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 19:08 ---
xfail within a dg-do command other than run has no effect, at least not with
DejaGnu 1.4.4 used with GCC at least as far back as 3.0. The DejaGnu
documentation doesn't mention the dg-* directives. The comments in
dej
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:14 ---
How embarrassing, I tried these things by adding new tests to
gcc.test-framework and the awk script that checks the results was ignoring some
of the results because of magic needed for the generated tests. Now I'm abl
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 17:57 ---
This is odd, if the test case has a syntax error the xfail works as expected,
but with #error it doesn't. I'll look into it.
Take a look at gcc/testsuite/gcc.test-framework, which tests lots of
combinations
of direct
--- Comment #1 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-11 15:14 ---
We probably should have some sort of dg conformance test directory with simple
tests ensuring all the directives work as advertised.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25352
11 matches
Mail list logo
