--- Comment #7 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-31 13:44 ---
Fixed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-12/msg01629.html
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-31 01:00 ---
Subject: Bug 25214
Author: ghazi
Date: Sat Dec 31 01:00:54 2005
New Revision: 109196
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109196
Log:
PR testsuite/25214
* gcc.dg/i386-local2.c: Skip i
--- Comment #5 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-31 00:59 ---
Subject: Bug 25214
Author: ghazi
Date: Sat Dec 31 00:59:26 2005
New Revision: 109195
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109195
Log:
PR testsuite/25214
* gcc.dg/i386-local2.c: Skip i
--- Comment #4 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-31 00:54 ---
Subject: Bug 25214
Author: ghazi
Date: Sat Dec 31 00:54:00 2005
New Revision: 109194
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109194
Log:
PR testsuite/25214
* gcc.target/i386/local2.c: Sk
--- Comment #3 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-31 00:46 ---
Subject: Bug 25214
Author: ghazi
Date: Sat Dec 31 00:46:05 2005
New Revision: 109193
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109193
Log:
PR testsuite/25214
* gcc.target/i386/local2.c: Sk
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 01:04 ---
This looks more like a testsuite bug as if you look into the testcase, we
actually will require a stack maninpulation.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
