https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101002
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #9)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #4)
> > These die because the struct we're using to check the alignment of uses long
> > double as the "big" aligne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101002
--- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn ---
Please be careful about the effect on AIX. AIX defaults to long-double-64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101002
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #4)
> These die because the struct we're using to check the alignment of uses long
> double as the "big" aligned type. We could either disable the tests using a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101002
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #7)
> There are a few other testsuite regressions due to a linker warning the
> testsuite wouldn't ignore:
>
> /opt/binutils-power10/bin/ld: /tmp/ccysrhL7.o uses 64-b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101002
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #6)
> I'm going to test the following to see whether anything bad falls out:
>
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101002
--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #5)
> The creation of the __ibm128 type is guarded by:
>
> if (TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_128 && (!TARGET_IEEEQUAD || TARGET_FLOAT128_TYPE))
>
> Since the __ibm128 type is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101002
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #4)
> gcc.target/powerpc/pr85657-3.c
> gcc.target/powerpc/signbit-1.c
> pr85657-3.c:38:20: error: unknown type name ‘__ibm128’; did you mean
> ‘__int128’?
>
> These d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101002
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101002
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2)
> The first test is for _Float128. What goes wrong there?
>
> For all these tests yo
..u have to figure out what is going wrong. After that it will
l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101002
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The first test is for _Float128. What goes wrong there?
For all these tests yo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101002
--- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner ---
Are these tests valid for long double == double? Ie, do we just need to
disable them when using -mlong-double-64 or are these real bugs? I'm guessing
the latter for most of these tests, but just checking.
11 matches
Mail list logo
