https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ed78f8bd84eb696579d928c816bc840664829b2
commit r9-9792-g5ed78f8bd84eb696579d928c816bc840664829b2
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu Oc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:523dc71f5cb858da18e1f648269746dab519b445
commit r10-10228-g523dc71f5cb858da18e1f648269746dab519b445
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e74336df42fa36244d576dd155d7e2e2c42bc3a0
commit r11-9179-ge74336df42fa36244d576dd155d7e2e2c42bc3a0
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1373066a46d8d47abd97e46a005aef3b3dbfe94a
commit r12-4619-g1373066a46d8d47abd97e46a005aef3b3dbfe94a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu Oct 21 09
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #13)
> > @H.J. Can you please document that one needs at least i686 CPU for the
> > functionality?
>
> Like this?
>
> diff --g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #13)
> @H.J. Can you please document that one needs at least i686 CPU for the
> functionality?
Like this?
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index c66a2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
Bug 98667 depends on bug 70454, which changed state.
Bug 70454 Summary: --with-arch=native isn't applied to 32-bit x86 target library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70454
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #11 from Matthew Whitehead ---
A patch has been proposed to remove the -fcf-protection=full from the ebuild
script:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/765442
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Matthew Whitehead from comment #1)
> Here is the full set of compiler flags used.
>
> readelf --string-dump='.GCC.command.line' /usr/lib/debug/$( which eix
> ).debug
>
> String dump of section '.G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:77d372abec0fbf2cfe922e3140ee3410248f979e
commit r11-6672-g77d372abec0fbf2cfe922e3140ee3410248f979e
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu Jan 14 05:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> It probably makes sense to disable CET by default when GCC is configured to
> "less" than i686-linux (definitely for i386 and i486, not sure about i586).
> Thus change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/563478.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Whitehead ---
It looks like /usr/bin/gdb 10.1 also has this opcode in it:
objdump -D /usr/bin/gdb | grep -B6 -A6 endbr32
60d7b5: 3f aas
60d7b6: 1a 3b sbb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #3 from Matthew Whitehead ---
This is on an actual first generation i486DX 40MHz system I use to test for
code issues exactly like this case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Is this directly on a i486 box or VirtualBox? VirtualBox might have a bug.
19 matches
Mail list logo