https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98648
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98648
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed by r12-6071-g19dcecd963295b02b96c8cac57933657dbe3234a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98648
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|ABI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98648
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98648
--- Comment #4 from Gabriel Ravier ---
This code :
typedef int64_t v2di __attribute__((vector_size(16)));
v2di f(__m128 val)
{
return (~(v2di)_mm_set_ps1(0.0f) & (v2di)val);
}
is optimized better (and is equivalent, if I understand the se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98648
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98648
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98648
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski -
