https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2cf6f31527c6d8dd2cc96f4efe8ff70d60d5fb44
commit r11-527-g2cf6f31527c6d8dd2cc96f4efe8ff70d60d5fb44
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > > The "i" constraint shouldn't be used for flag_pic since symbolic constant
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > The "i" constraint shouldn't be used for flag_pic since symbolic constant
> > leads to writable text in 32-bit mode and invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> The "i" constraint shouldn't be used for flag_pic since symbolic constant
> leads to writable text in 32-bit mode and invalid in 64-bit mode.
Just a typo. "i" should be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
The "i" constraint shouldn't be used for flag_pic since symbolic constant
leads to writable text in 32-bit mode and invalid in 64-bit mode.
