https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94587
--- Comment #8 from Patrick J. LoPresti ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> (In reply to Patrick J. LoPresti from comment #5)
> > I did not use -ffp-contract=fast nor -funsafe-math-optimizations nor
> > -ffast-math. Yet the statemen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94587
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, clang defaults to -ffp-contract=on which is like =fast (except when you
use FP_CONTRACT pragma).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94587
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Patrick J. LoPresti from comment #5)
> I did not use -ffp-contract=fast nor -funsafe-math-optimizations nor
> -ffast-math. Yet the statements were contracted. So the documentation has a
> bug.
N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94587
--- Comment #5 from Patrick J. LoPresti ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
>
> Note this is true even without using intrinsics really. You can get the
> same behavior you are seeing with using standard C code.
Yes, which is one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94587
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94587
Patrick J. LoPresti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94587
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94587
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
