[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

2019-11-22 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- C

[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

2019-11-22 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

2019-11-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

2019-09-05 Thread edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 --- Comment #8 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Thu Sep 5 13:40:17 2019 New Revision: 275409 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275409&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-05 Bernd Edlinger PR middle-end/91615 * ex

[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

2019-09-05 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 --- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #6) > Created attachment 46820 [details] > untested patch This patch fixes the armeb problems reported here, thanks! (in addition to the scan-assembler-times issue

[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

2019-09-04 Thread edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

2019-09-04 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 --- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #4) > Hi Christophe, > > many thanks for your invaluable help. > > I think except this one all regressions are fixed or > at least understood. > > Unfortunately I

[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

2019-09-03 Thread edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger --- Hi Christophe, many thanks for your invaluable help. I think except this one all regressions are fixed or at least understood. Unfortunately I have a bit of trouble to reproduce this could you please give

[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

2019-09-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

2019-09-01 Thread edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger --- yes that looks very likely. I was not able to reproduce this particular failure, but you can try out the patch I attached to pr91612 and see if it fixes you problem. I am currently short of test capability a

[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

2019-09-01 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

2019-08-30 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 --- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon --- There are also 2 regressions in gfortran --target armeb-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-cpu cortex-a9 --with-fpu neon-fp16 gfortran.dg/vect/no-vfa-pr32377.f90 -O (internal compiler error) gfortran.dg/vect/p