https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d2248bec5d22061ab252724bd59d45c8a47e009
commit r10-6591-g4d2248bec5d22061ab252724bd59d45c8a47e009
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Tue Feb 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
--- Comment #13 from Kewen Lin ---
> “The newly generated doesn't look incorrect since some semantic changes as
> below.”
Sorry, typo, it should be "The newly generated insn doesn't look correct since
some semantic changes as below."
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
--- Comment #11 from Kewen Lin ---
Thanks a lot for Martin's help on reproduction. I can reproduce this ICE and
confirmed that if commenting out my patch r272731 in loop-iv.c, it can pass. I
can also reproduce it on powerpc64 (ppc64-redhat-linux)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #9)
> I can't reproduce this on both powerpc64le-linux-gnu
> (edabbec31e3bfc9a9757f80c8610706ed00e5a1a) and ppc64-redhat-linux (r278916),
> IIUC I need the powerpc-e300c3 e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
--- Comment #9 from Kewen Lin ---
I can't reproduce this on both powerpc64le-linux-gnu
(edabbec31e3bfc9a9757f80c8610706ed00e5a1a) and ppc64-redhat-linux (r278916),
IIUC I need the powerpc-e300c3 environment header/library as sysroot for
cross-com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
--- Comment #8 from Kewen Lin ---
Sorry, I just saw this bug was starting to fail with my commit. Thanks for @ing
me! My commit is just to pass the finiteness information down to RTL phase. The
loops in that case are simple and have only an exit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
@Kewen: Can you please take a look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #5)
> Thanks. It's not specific to powerpc, then.
Well, it is probably, I'm testing powerpc-e300c3 cross compiler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-*-linux-gnu |
--- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
I can still reproduce it with r279828.
$ /dev/shm/gcc-objdir-bisect/gcc/xg++ -B/dev/shm/gcc-objdir-bisect/gcc
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/cost-model-pr34445.f
-misel -O2 -fstac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
I cannot reproduce it anymore as of r279405.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
CC|
18 matches
Mail list logo
