https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 8 10:29:21 2019
New Revision: 267715
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267715&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-12-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 21 16:01:53 2018
New Revision: 267327
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267327&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/88522
* config/i386/sse.md (*avx512pf_gatherpfsf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45275
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45275&action=edit
gcc9-pr88522.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 87471 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yes, it does. So, shall we emit just PTR always, or have a configure check to
detect this and use PTR if assembler with this support isn't detect, otherwise
whatever it requires newly (is that whatever is no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> binutils 2.29 doesn't accept the syntax that 2.32 accepts and vice versa.
> Why has it changed incompatibly?
> Shouldn't new binutils accept both forms?
binutils 2.29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
