https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #18 from Martin Liška ---
Maybe PR86684?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #17 from Bill Seurer ---
Is there some earlier report to which this is a follow-on? The first comment
here sort of implies that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #15)
> Martin, are you expecting this build to have 64 bit or 128 bit long doubles?
> The default should be 128 as it is natively but for some reason the cross
> compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #15 from Bill Seurer ---
Martin, are you expecting this build to have 64 bit or 128 bit long doubles?
The default should be 128 as it is natively but for some reason the cross
compiler is using 64. Even with that, though, the compil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #14 from Bill Seurer ---
I compared what happens with long double and they are very different
int do_signbit_tf (long double a) { return __builtin_signbit (a); }
cross:
;;
;; Full RTL generated for this function:
;;
(note 1 0 4 NOTE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
If both compilers default to ibmlongdouble, both should use TFmode, no?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #12 from Bill Seurer ---
confgures are identical.
Default compiler options are also identical, from -Q --help=target:
The following options are target specific:
-G0
-m32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #8)
> Cross:
> ;;
> ;; Full RTL generated for this function:
> ;;
> (note 1 0 4 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)
> (note 4 1 2 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
> (insn 2 4 3 2 (set (me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #9)
> So what causes this TF vs. IF? Cross and native should be exactly the same,
> but perhaps there is a difference in the configurations you have for the two?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
So what causes this TF vs. IF? Cross and native should be exactly the same,
but perhaps there is a difference in the configurations you have for the two?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #6)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> > > Yep, I can still reproduce it with the current master in a cross c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #5)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> > Yep, I can still reproduce it with the current master in a cross compiler.
>
> Ok, thanks. I'll see if I can recr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> Yep, I can still reproduce it with the current master in a cross compiler.
Ok, thanks. I'll see if I can recreate it with a cross since I cannot get it
to fail w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
Martin, can you please check whether you still see this ICE?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
This doesn't fail for me using a native build. Martin, can you recheck to see
if this is now fixed? There have been some changes in this area and I do see
that pattern in my dump file with no ICE:
(insn 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
/usr/bin/powerpc64le-suse-linux-as --version
GNU assembler (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Tumbleweed) 2.31
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it unde
18 matches
Mail list logo
