https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86805
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86805
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Sep 28 08:55:03 2019
New Revision: 276245
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276245&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2019-09-28 Oleg Endo
Backport from mainline
2019-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86805
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Sep 28 08:53:27 2019
New Revision: 276244
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276244&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2019-09-28 Oleg Endo
PR target/86805
* config/sh/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86805
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
I'm not aware of any SH implementations that do speculative execution or data
access. So I guess
#undef TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATION_SAFE_VALUE
#define TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATION_SAFE_VALUE speculation_safe_value_not_
