https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84760
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84760
--- Comment #4 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Thu Mar 22 15:42:39 2018
New Revision: 258774
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258774&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018-03-22 Kelvin Nilsen
PR target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84760
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84760
--- Comment #2 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I don't argue either way on this, but it looks to me like we do not currently
have support for __int128 with vec_ld.
1. I can't fine it in the rs6000-c tables.
2. This test fails to compile:
#in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84760
--- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt ---
Hm. For this one I think I would recommend we just remove the partial
implementation, provided that vec_ld already supports vector __int128.
