https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #20 from Peter Bergne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
--- Comment #18 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Jan 4 14:36:35 2018
New Revision: 256250
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256250&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/83387
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_discov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
> > > --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c(revision 255700)
> > > +++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c(working copy)
> > > @@ -11095,7 +11095,8 @@ rs6000_discover_homogeneous_aggregate (m
> > > homoge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
--- Comment #15 from Sebastian Huber ---
(In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #14)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #13)
> > (In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #12)
> > > (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9)
> > > [...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
--- Comment #14 from Sebastian Huber ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #13)
> (In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9)
> > [...]
> > > Here, you can see that on ELFv2, we always assu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
--- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #12)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9)
> [...]
> > Here, you can see that on ELFv2, we always assume HW FP regs are avialable,
> > because we're forcing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
--- Comment #12 from Sebastian Huber ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9)
[...]
> Here, you can see that on ELFv2, we always assume HW FP regs are avialable,
> because we're forcing usage of HW FP registers (FP_ARG_RETURN, ie, f1, aka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
--- Comment #11 from sh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sh
Date: Tue Dec 19 08:20:05 2017
New Revision: 255810
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255810&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
RTEMS/PowerPC: Remove 64-bit soft-float multilib
gcc/
PR tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
--- Comment #10 from sh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sh
Date: Tue Dec 19 08:16:34 2017
New Revision: 255809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255809&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
RTEMS/PowerPC: Remove 64-bit soft-float multilib
gcc/
PR tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner ---
...and the parallel with the FP reg use (33 and 34) come from:
expand_call():
valreg = hard_function_value (build_pointer_type (rettype),
fndecl, NULL, (pass == 0));
har
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-rtems5 |powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g
15 matches
Mail list logo
