https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80376
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80376
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Apr 12 13:45:27 2017
New Revision: 246874
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246874&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-04-12 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
2017-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80376
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Apr 12 13:37:30 2017
New Revision: 246873
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246873&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-04-12 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
2017-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80376
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Backports still needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80376
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Apr 11 21:37:16 2017
New Revision: 246859
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246859&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-04-11 Bill Schmidt
PR target/80376
PR target/80
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80376
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Patch under test would produce the follow errors instead:
wschmidt@pike:~/src$ $GCC_INSTALL/bin/gcc pr80376.c
pr80376.c: In function 'main':
pr80376.c:12:5: error: argument 3 must be a 2-bit unsigned literal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80376
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
It's difficult to completely avoid an ICE, as once we have a nested call with
an invalid value it is not simple to recover with our current design. However,
I will put together a patch that provides better er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80376
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #2 from B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80376
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
