https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357
--- Comment #11 from Sebastian Huber ---
Thanks for your kind help. Would it be possible to back port this to GCC 6
also?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357
--- Comment #10 from Chung-Lin Tang ---
Author: cltang
Date: Thu Nov 17 06:26:56 2016
New Revision: 242534
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242534&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-17 Chung-Lin Tang
PR target/78357
* config/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357
--- Comment #9 from Chung-Lin Tang ---
(In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #8)
> (In reply to Chung-Lin Tang from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #6)
> > > (In reply to Chung-Lin Tang from comment #5)
> > > > > I c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian Huber ---
(In reply to Chung-Lin Tang from comment #7)
> (In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Chung-Lin Tang from comment #5)
> > > > I checked the code generation on some targets for the te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357
--- Comment #7 from Chung-Lin Tang ---
(In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #6)
> (In reply to Chung-Lin Tang from comment #5)
> > > I checked the code generation on some targets for the test case above. The
> > > arm, bfin, epiphany, i386,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Huber ---
(In reply to Chung-Lin Tang from comment #5)
> > I checked the code generation on some targets for the test case above. The
> > arm, bfin, epiphany, i386, lm32, m68k, mips, moxie, sh, v850 targets
> > gener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357
--- Comment #5 from Chung-Lin Tang ---
> I checked the code generation on some targets for the test case above. The
> arm, bfin, epiphany, i386, lm32, m68k, mips, moxie, sh, v850 targets
> generated all __atomic_* functions.
> Only on Nios II i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Huber ---
(In reply to Chung-Lin Tang from comment #3)
> (In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Chung-Lin Tang from comment #1)
> > > Sebastian, I'm not sure what your problem is. The atomics
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357
--- Comment #3 from Chung-Lin Tang ---
(In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #2)
> (In reply to Chung-Lin Tang from comment #1)
> > Sebastian, I'm not sure what your problem is. The atomics in nios2 are
> > implemented by __sync_* functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Huber ---
(In reply to Chung-Lin Tang from comment #1)
> Sebastian, I'm not sure what your problem is. The atomics in nios2 are
> implemented by __sync_* functions placed in libgcc. The built-in function
> expansion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357
Chung-Lin Tang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cltang at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
12 matches
Mail list logo
