[Bug target/77326] [avr] Invalid optimization using varargs and a weak function

2016-09-21 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77326 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Sep 21 14:11:59 2016 New Revision: 240315 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240315&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ Backport from 2016-09-21 trunk r240306. PR target/77

[Bug target/77326] [avr] Invalid optimization using varargs and a weak function

2016-09-21 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77326 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Sep 21 09:31:38 2016 New Revision: 240308 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240308&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from 2016-09-21 trunk r240306. PR target/77326

[Bug target/77326] [avr] Invalid optimization using varargs and a weak function

2016-09-21 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77326 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Sep 21 09:17:32 2016 New Revision: 240306 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240306&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/77326 * config/avr/avr.c (avr_notice_updat

[Bug target/77326] [avr] Invalid optimization using varargs and a weak function

2016-08-22 Thread matthijs at stdin dot nl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77326 --- Comment #1 from Matthijs Kooijman --- The original reporter just added a comment that this does not occur anymore in gcc 6.1.0, though I haven't got anything newer than 5.1 available here to check.