[Bug target/71270] [7 Regression] fortran regression after fix SLP PR58135

2017-01-20 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71270 --- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri Jan 20 14:36:57 2017 New Revision: 244716 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244716&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/71270 fix neon_valid_immediate for big-en

[Bug target/71270] [7 Regression] fortran regression after fix SLP PR58135

2017-01-20 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71270 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/71270] [7 Regression] fortran regression after fix SLP PR58135

2017-01-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71270 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/71270] [7 Regression] fortran regression after fix SLP PR58135

2017-01-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71270 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Patch posted, not reviewed yet: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg00381.html

[Bug target/71270] [7 Regression] fortran regression after fix SLP PR58135

2016-12-14 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71270 --- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #8) > After playing around with this I believe the problem is in the > *neon_mov pattern in the arm backend. The way it constructs the > const_vector of {1, 0,

[Bug target/71270] [7 Regression] fortran regression after fix SLP PR58135

2016-12-14 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71270 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC

[Bug target/71270] [7 Regression] fortran regression after fix SLP PR58135

2016-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71270 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/71270] [7 Regression] fortran regression after fix SLP PR58135

2016-05-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71270 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71270] [7 Regression] fortran regression after fix SLP PR58135

2016-05-27 Thread vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71270 --- Comment #5 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org --- The expand dump after SLP split ---snip-- ;; MEM[(logical(kind=1) *)&A.8] = { 1, 0, 1, 0 }; (insn 71 70 72 (set (reg:SI 308) (const_int 16777472 [0x1000100])) intrinsic_pack_1.f90:49 -1

[Bug target/71270] [7 Regression] fortran regression after fix SLP PR58135

2016-05-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71270 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |target --- Comment #4 from Richard Bien