[Bug target/69275] ICE compiling rs6000/float-128.c

2016-01-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69275] ICE compiling rs6000/float-128.c

2016-01-14 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- For now, I have reverted the patch that causes the problem. When I get back into the office on January 19th, I will look at ways to fix this problem.

[Bug target/69275] ICE compiling rs6000/float-128.c

2016-01-14 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |meissner at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug target/69275] ICE compiling rs6000/float-128.c

2016-01-14 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275 --- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > An explicit --enable-gnu-indirect-function during configuration works fine. This seems to work for me too, using my old binutils. I tried building with a

[Bug target/69275] ICE compiling rs6000/float-128.c

2016-01-14 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- ifunc is a glibc feature.

[Bug target/69275] ICE compiling rs6000/float-128.c

2016-01-14 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69275] ICE compiling rs6000/float-128.c

2016-01-14 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le-linux CC|