https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner ---
For now, I have reverted the patch that causes the problem.
When I get back into the office on January 19th, I will look at ways to fix
this problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |meissner at gcc dot
gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1)
> An explicit --enable-gnu-indirect-function during configuration works fine.
This seems to work for me too, using my old binutils. I tried building with a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
ifunc is a glibc feature.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux
CC|