https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #10)
> (In reply to ktkachov from comment #8)
> > The ICE is in the wide-int bit_and code when trying to process the rtx:
> >
> > (and:SI
> > (c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
--- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #8)
> The ICE is in the wide-int bit_and code when trying to process the rtx:
>
> (and:SI
> (const_int 4294963215 [0xf00f])
> (const_int 4111 [0x100
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
--- Comment #9 from Joel Sherrill ---
I don't build with checking enabled.
The normal recommended configuration for an RTEMS toolchain is long since we
build newlib at the same time and have iconv options. When I do git bisect, I
usually drop t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #5)
> Confirmed - svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@219641
>
> Passed in a build I had from 13/01/2015.
>
> This is a regression.
now that I re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #5)
> Confirmed - svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@219641
>
> Passed in a build I had from 13/01/2015.
>
> This is a regression.
Huh, I reprod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
