https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #13 from collison at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: collison
Date: Tue Feb 10 07:53:23 2015
New Revision: 220570
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220570&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-10 Michael Collison
Backport from trunk r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Joel, can you try trunk after this commit to confirm that it fixes the ICE on
your end and close this off if ok?
Thanks,
Kyrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed Jan 14 10:14:23 2015
New Revision: 219583
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219583&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Fix PR target/64460: Set 'shift' attr properly on s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #8)
> (In reply to ktkachov from comment #7)
> > I guess the testcase is flaky.
> > I've posted the patch to fix the ICE and the reasoning behind it at
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #8 from Joel Sherrill ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #7)
> I guess the testcase is flaky.
> I've posted the patch to fix the ICE and the reasoning behind it at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg00686.html
Can yo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I guess the testcase is flaky.
I've posted the patch to fix the ICE and the reasoning behind it at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg00686.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #5)
> (In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #4)
> > (In reply to ktkachov from comment #3)
> > > I have a fix in the works. The bug is down to the "shift" attribute value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #4)
> (In reply to ktkachov from comment #3)
> > I have a fix in the works. The bug is down to the "shift" attribute value in
> > one of the patterns, alth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #4 from Joel Sherrill ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #3)
> I have a fix in the works. The bug is down to the "shift" attribute value in
> one of the patterns, although only xscale_sched_adjust_cost uses that
> attribute.
Awes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill ---
I ran a git bisect and it didn't narrow it down much but I hope this helps.
After the list of candidates, I am posting the full git bisect log.
Bisecting: 27 revisions left to test after this (roughly 5 step
13 matches
Mail list logo