https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
--- Comment #11 from Olivier Hainque ---
Created attachment 43406
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43406&action=edit
cumulative patch used in-house on gcc-4.9
Attached is a cumulative patch of what we have applied in-house on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
--- Comment #9 from leimaohui ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #8)
> Olivier Hainque referred to having a 4.9 version of his patch, I suggest
> you ask him.
Will these patches be backported to gcc 4.9.3 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Olivier Hainque referred to having a 4.9 version of his patch, I suggest
you ask him.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
leimaohui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||e500v2
--- Comment #7 from leimaohui ---
(I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
--- Comment #6 from leimaohui ---
Created attachment 34294
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34294&action=edit
the patch backport to gcc 4.9.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
--- Comment #5 from leimaohui ---
Thanks,these patches do work.
I used gcc(master:7a542b16e34cfb40fe37fab74a119e80a1a55587) to do a test likes
below:
kernel : 3.14.19
ltp:20120903
| test |with these patches|remove these patches|
|sem02
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
In such a case you need to debug the system as a whole until you have
isolated the bug to one component and can then report it to that component
with evidence for where the bug is.
It's qu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
--- Comment #3 from leimaohui ---
Thanks for joseph's reply.
But I found the reason is the founction "pthread_exit(0)" can't execut
normally。
Because it will lead a SIGABRT signal and aborted .
I wrote a test program and make a test.The envirom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, leimaohui at cn dot fujitsu.com wrote:
> kernel :3.4.74
Don't expect particularly meaningful floating-point results on e500 for
any kernel without my six-patch series
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
--- Comment #1 from leimaohui ---
I changed the gcc from 4.9.1 to 4.9.2 in yocto,and tested these cases.
The results are the same.
But when I changed the gcc to 4.8.2,the results of these cases are PASS.
11 matches
Mail list logo
