https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63901
--- Comment #5 from Peter A. Bigot ---
Yes, that could work. msp430mcu in mspgcc days did a lot more than specs
fragments; if interested see the relevant material (BSD-3-Clause) is in the
msp430mcu repository at:
https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63901
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Peter,
> In mspgcc, TI provided a CSV file that listed every device along with all
> its characteristics. This is still present in the GCC header bundle TI
> provides. This in turn was processed to produ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63901
--- Comment #3 from Peter A. Bigot ---
But it's already bad, because you have the list of MCUs hard-coded into the
compiler source, which is a lot worse than doing through the specs.
It's really unfortunate that somebody decided to exclude me fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63901
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Peter,
The whole hardware multiply selection thing is a bit of a mess...
The uploaded patch should resolve the problem for now by building newlib with
software multiply enabled.
In the long term we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63901
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
