https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.3 |4.9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
--- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jul 25 07:47:36 2014
New Revision: 213046
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213046&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-07-14 Jakub Jelinek
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jul 14 07:31:57 2014
New Revision: 212509
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212509&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61656
* config/i386/i386.c (classify_argument): Don't me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The patch actually just removes the undefined behavior and nothing else, it
really doesn't affect code generation. It just causes merge_classes (which is
a const function) not to be called on (initialized) s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> then it uses movq %rsi, ... and the patch doesn't change anything on that.
> If you want to use movl %esi, ... in foo in this testcase, more changes are
> needed o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Depends on what testcase. In pr42025-2.c, it clearly uses movl %edi, %eax,
with and without the patch. If I write:
typedef struct
{
int p;
} Ptr;
struct A
{
long int i;
union
{
Ptr p;
int q
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> So, are you ok with the #c0 pseudo patch? I guess I can bootstrap/regtest
> it today.
If we are narrowing the load from movq to movl for a SImode value, then the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, are you ok with the #c0 pseudo patch? I guess I can bootstrap/regtest it
today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #0)
> /usr/src/gcc/obj052/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/src/gcc/obj052/gcc/
> -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -O0 -w -c -o pr4
> 2025-2.o /usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsui
13 matches
Mail list logo
