[Bug target/61300] powerpc64le miscompile with K&R-style function definition at -O0

2014-06-11 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61300 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/61300] powerpc64le miscompile with K&R-style function definition at -O0

2014-06-11 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61300 --- Comment #10 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Wed Jun 11 23:50:16 2014 New Revision: 211483 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211483&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/61300 * doc/tm.texi.in (INCOMING_REG_PARM_STACK_SPACE): Do

[Bug target/61300] powerpc64le miscompile with K&R-style function definition at -O0

2014-06-11 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61300 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Wed Jun 11 23:49:49 2014 New Revision: 211482 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211482&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/61300 * doc/tm.texi.in (INCOMING_REG_PARM_STACK_SPACE): Doc

[Bug target/61300] powerpc64le miscompile with K&R-style function definition at -O0

2014-06-05 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61300 --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Fri Jun 6 01:04:22 2014 New Revision: 211296 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211296&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/61300 * doc/tm.texi.in (INCOMING_REG_PARM_STACK_SPACE): Doc

[Bug target/61300] powerpc64le miscompile with K&R-style function definition at -O0

2014-06-02 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61300 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- No, I don't believe there is a convenient way we can look at the REG_PARM_STACK_SPACE argument to determine whether it was used for a call or for a function body. (I did think it might be possible, hence my com

[Bug target/61300] powerpc64le miscompile with K&R-style function definition at -O0

2014-06-02 Thread uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61300 Ulrich Weigand changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment