[Bug target/60821] gcc 4.8 on MacOS fails depending on -arch order

2019-03-23 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60821 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/60821] gcc 4.8 on MacOS fails depending on -arch order

2014-04-14 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60821 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to a.h.jaffe from comment #6) > Thanks for the comprehensive info. It would certainly be nice to get the > driverdriver into the main code-base. indeed, patches always welcome :) > > However, one th

[Bug target/60821] gcc 4.8 on MacOS fails depending on -arch order

2014-04-14 Thread a.h.jaffe at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60821 --- Comment #6 from a.h.jaffe at gmail dot com --- Thanks for the comprehensive info. It would certainly be nice to get the driverdriver into the main code-base. However, one thing still puzzles me: > 5. We do accept -arch on x86: -arch i386 get

[Bug target/60821] gcc 4.8 on MacOS fails depending on -arch order

2014-04-12 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60821 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target||*-darwin* Priority|P3

[Bug target/60821] gcc 4.8 on MacOS fails depending on -arch order

2014-04-12 Thread a.h.jaffe at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60821 --- Comment #4 from a.h.jaffe at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3) > Whoops, sorry. I better let Darwin folks look at it. Ah, but in fact *I* misunderstood. There's a difference between the FSF and Apple versions: "F