https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If this is fixed even on the trunk (#c6 mentions just 4.9), then it is fine to
close this IMHO.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
--- Comment #11 from Alan Lawrence ---
As I understand it, This is fixed in both 4.9 and 5.0 branch. Is there any more
we want to do or can it now be closed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
--- Comment #10 from Alan Lawrence ---
I can confirm that prior to V1DFmode, all four of those cases gave an ICE (in
emit_move_insn, via a variety of routes).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I've been just concerned, many backends derive (perhaps incorrectly) passing
conventions from DECL_MODE or TYPE_MODE and so any changes in that are a red
flag to me.
If passing as arguments and returning the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
Alan Lawrence changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alan.lawrence at arm dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Isn't even this change ABI changing? I know you ICE when returning such
vectors, but doesn't the change from BLKmode to V1DFmode change how such vars
are laid out in structures, or passed in as arguments, or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
--- Comment #6 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alalaw01
Date: Tue Jul 8 10:32:57 2014
New Revision: 212355
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212355&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r211502: PR target/59843 Fix arm_neon.h ZIP/UZP/T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
Yufeng Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|yufeng at gcc dot g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
--- Comment #3 from Yufeng Zhang ---
This issue is related to the handling of vector of one double in the AArch64
backend. We don't have a corresponding type defined in ACLE (ARM C Language
Extension) the spec and backend is not able to handle it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
Yufeng Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-linux |aarch64-linux aarch64-elf
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
13 matches
Mail list logo