[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-02-10 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-02-10 Thread bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #10 from bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: bviyer Date: Mon Feb 10 16:56:54 2014 New Revision: 207664 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207664&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix for PR target/59691. +2014-02-10 Balaji V. Iyer + +

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-25 Thread bviyer at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #9 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hi Bernd and H. J., The catch_exc.cc bug is a different issue. It is failing in most 32 bit machines and we are currently looking into it. Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer.

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Balaji V. Iyer from comment #5) > Created attachment 31938 [details] > Possible Fix. > > Possible fix. You can replace cpu_supports_sse with __builtin_cpu_supports since __builtin_cpu_supports("sse")

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-25 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Balaji V. Iyer from comment #6) > Hi Jeff, Andrew and Bernd, >Can you please try out the "possible fix" and > see if that works for you? > > Thanks, > > Balaji V. Iyer. Hi the patch works,

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-23 Thread bviyer at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #6 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hi Jeff, Andrew and Bernd, Can you please try out the "possible fix" and see if that works for you? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer.

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-23 Thread bviyer at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #5 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Created attachment 31938 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31938&action=edit Possible Fix. Possible fix.

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-22 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- On 01/22/14 10:45, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 > > --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- > (In reply to Balaji V. Iyer from comment #2) >> Hello Bern

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Balaji V. Iyer from comment #2) > Hello Bernd, > I don't have a pentium 2 machine readily available. Can you try this > patch and see if it works for you? This is not correct, there should be

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-22 Thread bviyer at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #2 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hello Bernd, I don't have a pentium 2 machine readily available. Can you try this patch and see if it works for you? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. diff --git a/libcilkrts/runtime/config/x86/os-unix-sysdep.c

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* Status|UNCONFIRMED