subject:"\[Bug target\/59573\] aarch64\: commit 07ca5686e64 broken glibc\-2.17"

[Bug target/59573] aarch64: commit 07ca5686e64 broken glibc-2.17

2013-12-23 Thread dennis.yxun at gmail dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59573 --- Comment #7 from Dennis Lan (dlan) --- Ok, it's qemu problem, not gcc. I've built rootfs in qemu (with cmeq insn implemented), then deploy the rootfs into foudation_v8 emulator. test to compiles code with gcc, and it works fine, without the li

[Bug target/59573] aarch64: commit 07ca5686e64 broken glibc-2.17

2013-12-23 Thread dennis.yxun at gmail dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59573 --- Comment #6 from Dennis Lan (dlan) --- (In reply to Yvan Roux from comment #5) > is the foundation model failing for the same reason here (i.e. not > recognizing the cmeq instruction) ? Not exactly, the foundation_v8 got abort while compiling

[Bug target/59573] aarch64: commit 07ca5686e64 broken glibc-2.17

2013-12-23 Thread yvan.roux at linaro dot org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59573 Yvan Roux changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yvan.roux at linaro dot org --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug target/59573] aarch64: commit 07ca5686e64 broken glibc-2.17

2013-12-22 Thread dennis.yxun at gmail dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59573 --- Comment #4 from Dennis.Yxun --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Can you try using ARM's foundation model (or another simulator) which should > be easier to compare against? Yes, I've tried with foundation_v8, and not only it ext