[Bug target/58623] lack of ldp/stp optimization

2014-12-17 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58623 --- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Evandro, There is specific PR for this issue. But as we know, fwprop often corrupts optimizations on address expression, for below example: add rb, r1, r2 ldr rx, [rb] add rb, rb, #4

[Bug target/58623] lack of ldp/stp optimization

2014-12-15 Thread e.menezes at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58623 --- Comment #6 from Evandro --- What's the PR of the fwprop issue? Thank you.

[Bug target/58623] lack of ldp/stp optimization

2014-12-11 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58623 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug target/58623] lack of ldp/stp optimization

2014-12-11 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58623 --- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to bin.cheng from comment #3) > Patch sent at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02209.html > On latest trunk, the patch generates below assembly for the example: > > .cpu g

[Bug target/58623] lack of ldp/stp optimization

2014-11-18 Thread amker.cheng at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58623 bin.cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug target/58623] lack of ldp/stp optimization

2014-07-24 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58623 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Target|AArch64 |aarch64-* Status|NEW

[Bug target/58623] lack of ldp/stp optimization

2013-10-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58623 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|