[Bug target/55953] hand loop faster then builtin memset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55953 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/55953] hand loop faster then builtin memset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55953 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-12 11:16:01 UTC --- See this patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00336.html (the thread continues in earlier and later months)

[Bug target/55953] hand loop faster then builtin memset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55953 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug target/55953] hand loop faster then builtin memset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55953 --- Comment #3 from Evgeniy Dushistov 2013-01-12 00:13:09 UTC --- Cross compiling for arm, g++ have almost the same version: arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-g++ (Linaro GCC 4.7-2012.10) 4.7.3 20121001: variant one (for): movwr3, #2280

[Bug target/55953] hand loop faster then builtin memset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55953 --- Comment #2 from Evgeniy Dushistov 2013-01-12 00:05:15 UTC --- Actually it is not only CPU 64bit related issue, for example the same CPU (i7), 32 bit mode: variant one: push %ebp vmovdqa 0x80488e0,%ymm0 mov%esp,%ebp pop%

[Bug target/55953] hand loop faster then builtin memset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55953 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Component|c