[Bug target/55894] No constant propagation in Intel intrinsics

2021-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55894 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2013-01-07 00:00:00 |2021-12-28 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pi

[Bug target/55894] No constant propagation in Intel intrinsics

2021-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55894 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|n

[Bug target/55894] No constant propagation in Intel intrinsics

2013-01-07 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55894 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-07 20:17:15 UTC --- Two more versions: __m128d f(){ union { long long t[2]; __m128d d; } a = {{ 0x7fff, 0x7fff }}; return a.d; } _Z1fv: .LFB537: .cfi_sta

[Bug target/55894] No constant propagation in Intel intrinsics

2013-01-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55894 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/55894] No constant propagation in Intel intrinsics

2013-01-07 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55894 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-07 13:48:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Usually target built-in folders are missing (targetm.fold_builtin). That's one possibility. But I was wondering (and almost filed it in rtl-optimizat

[Bug target/55894] No constant propagation in Intel intrinsics

2013-01-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55894 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|