[Bug target/54888] GCC with -Os is faster than -O3 on some AVR code

2013-02-02 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54888 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|g

[Bug target/54888] GCC with -Os is faster than -O3 on some AVR code

2012-10-22 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54888 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug target/54888] GCC with -Os is faster than -O3 on some AVR code

2012-10-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54888 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2012-10-22 12:56:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > And I actually don't understand teh issue: Optimizing for size does not > > require > > to produce slow code. The

[Bug target/54888] GCC with -Os is faster than -O3 on some AVR code

2012-10-22 Thread mojo at world3 dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54888 --- Comment #3 from mojo at world3 dot net 2012-10-22 12:40:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > And I actually don't understand teh issue: Optimizing for size does not > require > to produce slow code. The code may run fast. -O3 is

[Bug target/54888] GCC with -Os is faster than -O3 on some AVR code

2012-10-21 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54888 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Priority|P3