http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54888
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54888
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54888
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2012-10-22
12:56:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
>
> > And I actually don't understand teh issue: Optimizing for size does not
> > require
> > to produce slow code. The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54888
--- Comment #3 from mojo at world3 dot net 2012-10-22 12:40:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> And I actually don't understand teh issue: Optimizing for size does not
> require
> to produce slow code. The code may run fast.
-O3 is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54888
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Priority|P3