http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-28
12:21:01 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 28 12:20:54 2012
New Revision: 191827
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191827
Log:
PR target/54716
* config/i386/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-26 20:59:24
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > I haven't noticed a measurable performance difference though on Intel SNB
> > 2600
> > CPU though, so perhaps the patch i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-26 15:53:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I haven't noticed a measurable performance difference though on Intel SNB 2600
> CPU though, so perhaps the patch isn't needed.
Ah, I assumed they ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-26
15:40:53 UTC ---
On
#define vector __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)))
__attribute__((noinline, noclone))
vector float foo(vector float f, vector float h)
{
vector int g = { 0x8000, 0,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28282|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-26
14:23:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Created attachment 28282 [details]
> > gcc48-pr54716.patch
>
> Does this patch also fix xfail in gcc.target/i386/xorp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-26 14:01:13
UTC ---
Maybe also relevant: [1].
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01546.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-26 13:55:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created attachment 28282 [details]
> gcc48-pr54716.patch
Does this patch also fix xfail in gcc.target/i386/xorps-sse2.c?
IIRC, we generated correc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-26
13:46:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 28282
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28282
gcc48-pr54716.patch
Untested patch to optimize this.
Unfortunately it will also change g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
12 matches
Mail list logo
