https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53639
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53639
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-14
18:27:00 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 14 18:26:53 2012
New Revision: 188629
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188629
Log:
PR target/53639
* config/i386/i386.md (*and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53639
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-06-12 12:21:07
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Unfortunately that patch regressed pr49095.c testcase. So, either we limit
> the
> splitter to the paradoxical subreg that is created by the combiner when s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53639
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27606|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53639
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-12
07:40:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 27606
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27606
gcc48-pr53639.patch
The first problem is that combiner combines:
(insn 9 8 10 2 (parallel [
