https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
--- Comment #10 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
---
Ah, gotcha. In that case, please retitle as well to indicate such. Prior to
gcc-4.5, even support via emutls was not available on darwin, so some people in
#macports thought that's what this ti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia from comment #8)
> Seems to work to me in gcc-4.6:
TLS _is_ supported on Darwin by means of emutls (emulation using pthreads
interfaces).
This enhancement request is for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeremyhu at macports dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth 2012-03-01
14:15:14 UTC ---
Chris Lattner kindly pointed out that the initial tis support for darwin was
added in r105381.
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20100531/102158.html...
[llv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2012-03-01
01:29:13 UTC ---
The test/MC/MachO/tls.s from llvm svn also may have some useful hints on the
expected assembly for tis on darwin11 and later.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2012-03-01
01:27:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 26795
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26795
test/MC/MachO/tls.s from llvm svn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-29
17:18:19 UTC ---
Also in clang 3.0, I see test/CodeGen/darwin-thread-specifier.c which
contains...
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-macosx10.7.0 -emit-llvm -o - %s |
FileCheck %s
// CHECK: @b =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
--- Comment #1 from Mike Stump 2012-02-16
17:15:47 UTC ---
If you could snapshot some codegen, say
void foo() {
static __thread int i = 42;
++i;
}
or somesuch, we could see if they wired it up the same was as gcc is normally
wired.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin11
Host|
11 matches
Mail list logo
