http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50038
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50038
--- Comment #8 from Kirill Yukhin 2011-12-21
11:52:32 UTC ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Wed Dec 21 11:52:27 2011
New Revision: 182574
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182574
Log:
gcc/
2011-12-21 Enkovich Ilya
PR tar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50038
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50038
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2011-10-04 10:03:32
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> This patch is experimental and before sending it to patches mail-list i wanted
> to verify that at least the approach (modify implicit-zee pass and later
> en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50038
--- Comment #5 from tocarip.intel at gmail dot com 2011-10-04 09:52:03 UTC ---
This patch is experimental and before sending it to patches mail-list i wanted
to verify that at least the approach (modify implicit-zee pass and later enable
it on 32bi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50038
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2011-10-03 09:19:16
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> So assuming this approach (modify implicit-zee pass) is right, we'll have to
> enable this pass at least on x86 (32 bit). Is it ok ?
>
> P. S.
> I forgot to m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50038
tocarip.intel at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tocarip.intel at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50038
--- Comment #2 from tocarip.intel at gmail dot com 2011-09-27 10:15:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 25369
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25369
Possible solution
Here is an experimental patch which solves this problem. I modified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50038
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
