http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49385
--- Comment #6 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-19 08:13:09 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Mon Sep 19 08:13:02 2011
New Revision: 178955
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178955
Log:
2011-09-19 Jiangning Liu
Backport r1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49385
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49385
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-06-20
12:16:04 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Jun 20 12:15:58 2011
New Revision: 175208
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175208
Log:
Fix PR target/49385
2011-06-20 Ramana Ra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49385
--- Comment #3 from revital.eres at linaro dot org 2011-06-15 11:26:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Created attachment 24504 [details]
> The test to reproduce the RTL instruction.
> I see the following invalid mem to mem RTL instruction in te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49385
--- Comment #2 from revital.eres at linaro dot org 2011-06-13 11:26:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I get no ICE on this with 4.7 r174986, even with --enable-checking, and the
> assembler doesn't complain about the generated code.
> So what i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49385
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-13
11:20:23 UTC ---
I get no ICE on this with 4.7 r174986, even with --enable-checking, and the
assembler doesn't complain about the generated code.
So what is the problem?
