http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908
--- Comment #10 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2011-08-01 13:45:23 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been rece
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab 2011-07-31
15:09:28 UTC ---
Author: schwab
Date: Sun Jul 31 15:09:25 2011
New Revision: 176976
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176976
Log:
Author: Mikael Pettersson
PR target/47908
* gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab 2011-07-31
15:01:02 UTC ---
Author: schwab
Date: Sun Jul 31 15:00:58 2011
New Revision: 176975
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176975
Log:
Author: Mikael Pettersson
PR target/47908
* gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-07-29
11:44:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 24863
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24863
fix for gcc-4.5.3 and gcc-4.4.6
A patch for trunk and gcc-4.6.1 has been posted:
http://gcc.gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908
--- Comment #6 from Thorsten Glaser 2011-07-27 23:29:13
UTC ---
Mikael, can you please publish your “fully tested patches to fix this for
4.4.5, 4.5.2, and 4.6.0” so we can at least include this in the packages?
If the FSF itself (i.e. gnulib) s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tg at mirbsd dot org
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-04-11
07:36:17 UTC ---
I have fully tested patches to fix this for 4.4.5, 4.5.2, and 4.6.0 (presumably
that one will also work for 4.7 but I haven't checked), but I've avoided
posting them because the FS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908
Alan Hourihane changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alanh at fairlite dot co.uk
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-03-01
23:45:01 UTC ---
m68k needs to define TARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS_AFTER_CHANGE in order to override
the instruction scheduling options implied by attribute((optimize(2))).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-02-26
21:04:19 UTC ---
Other test cases that fail for the same reason include gcc.dg/pr37106-1.c,
gcc.dg/pr43562.c, and gcc.dg/pr43564.c.
11 matches
Mail list logo