[Bug target/45359] poor -march=native choices for VIA C7 Esther processors

2013-05-17 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45359 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug target/45359] poor -march=native choices for VIA C7 Esther processors

2013-04-25 Thread linuxball at netscape dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45359 linuxball at netscape dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linuxball at netsca

[Bug target/45359] poor -march=native choices for VIA C7 Esther processors

2010-11-18 Thread mahatma at eu dot by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45359 Dzianis Kahanovich changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22306|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/45359] poor -march=native choices for VIA C7 Esther processors

2010-11-07 Thread mahatma at eu dot by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45359 Dzianis Kahanovich changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #0|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/45359] poor -march=native choices for VIA C7 Esther processors

2010-11-01 Thread mahatma at eu dot by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45359 --- Comment #3 from Dzianis Kahanovich 2010-11-01 13:21:40 UTC --- Created attachment 0 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=0 native VIA/CentaurHauls (In reply to comment #1) > Why do you think it's a poor choice? This i

[Bug target/45359] poor -march=native choices for VIA C7 Esther processors

2010-08-24 Thread opod at nic-nac-project dot org
--- Comment #2 from opod at nic-nac-project dot org 2010-08-24 18:58 --- (In reply to comment #1) The processor clearly supports SSE3 so perhaps -march=prescott would be better instead of -march=pentium-m. I also assumed that -march=pentium-m implies -mfpmath=387 but it does not seem to

[Bug target/45359] poor -march=native choices for VIA C7 Esther processors

2010-08-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-23 20:17 --- Why do you think it's a poor choice? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added