[Bug target/44999] "and r0, r0, #255" can be replace with uxtb in thumb2

2010-08-21 Thread carrot at google dot com
--- Comment #4 from carrot at google dot com 2010-08-22 04:34 --- Both have been fixed. But I don't have the permission to close PR43461.(In reply to comment #3) > Didn't Carrot's r163184 fix this PR and its dupe PR43461? > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44999

[Bug target/44999] "and r0, r0, #255" can be replace with uxtb in thumb2

2010-08-21 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #3 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-08-21 17:28 --- Didn't Carrot's r163184 fix this PR and its dupe PR43461? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44999

[Bug target/44999] "and r0, r0, #255" can be replace with uxtb in thumb2

2010-07-24 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 19:47 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 43461 *** -- rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/44999] "and r0, r0, #255" can be replace with uxtb in thumb2

2010-07-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords||missed-op

[Bug target/44999] "and r0, r0, #255" can be replace with uxtb in thumb2

2010-07-20 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 08:37 --- Note, it's often helpful for us non-ARM-assembly-gurus to explain the pattern you would like to have, instead of the mnemonic :-) -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed