http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.3 |4.5.4
--- Comment #33 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
--- Comment #32 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-10
10:27:30 UTC ---
Backporting regression fixes is generally fine and does not require explicit
approval (given that the patches do not need significant changes).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
--- Comment #31 from Jie Zhang 2010-12-21 04:16:19
UTC ---
Patch for 4.5 was posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg01351.html
Waiting for approval.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
Serge Belyshev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
Serge Belyshev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2010-05-29 11:42:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.2 |4.5.3
--- Comment #30 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
--- Comment #29 from Jie Zhang 2010-12-16 03:05:53
UTC ---
Serge, yes. But GCC 4.5 branch is frozen now again.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
Serge Belyshev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|REOPENED
--- Comment #23 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 14:52 ---
Set the status to FIXED.
--
jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Comment #22 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 14:51 ---
Should be fixed on trunk now.
--
jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
As
--- Comment #21 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 14:48 ---
Subject: Bug 44290
Author: jiez
Date: Fri Jul 23 14:47:46 2010
New Revision: 162466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162466
Log:
PR target/44290
* attribs.c (decl_attributes): Ins
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
--- Comment #20 from raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2010-05-30 06:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=20777)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20777&action=view)
includes fix for all arms
I see the problem after reading Richard's comment #10, here is some more
additions to
--- Comment #19 from raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2010-05-30 05:58 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Created an attachment (id=20773)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20773&action=view) [edit]
> linux kernel workaround for attribute naked breakage
>
> This patch makes
--- Comment #18 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-05-29 18:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=20773)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20773&action=view)
linux kernel workaround for attribute naked breakage
This patch makes the Linux kernel add noinline and noclone att
--- Comment #17 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-05-29 14:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=20772)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20772&action=view)
test case from copypage-xscale.c
This is distilled from the kernel's copypage-xscale.c file and illustrates the
iss
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-29 14:46
---
And CC a arm maintainer. There might be more target-specific attributes that
need adjustment.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-29 14:45
---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > Or rather, if you have
> >
> > void __attribute__((naked)) foo (int i)
> > {
> > asm("use i");
> > }
> >
> > without any inputs refering to i that is in
20 matches
Mail list logo
