--- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-20 21:46
---
By Jakub.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 09:26 ---
Subject: Bug 40668
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jul 11 09:26:23 2009
New Revision: 149512
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149512
Log:
PR target/40668
* function.c (assign_parm_setup_
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 09:23 ---
Subject: Bug 40668
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jul 11 09:23:32 2009
New Revision: 149511
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149511
Log:
PR target/40668
* function.c (assign_parm_setup_s
--- Comment #8 from blp at cs dot stanford dot edu 2009-07-08 17:30 ---
Wow, that's amazingly fast turnaround. Thanks so much guys!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40668
--- Comment #7 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-08 16:43 ---
4.4-20090630 plus this fix bootstrapped fine, fixed the test case, built a
working 2.6.31-rc2 Linux kernel, and built a working Erlang VM.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40668
--- Comment #6 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-07 23:10 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created an attachment (id=18151)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18151&action=view) [edit]
> gcc44-pr40668.patch
>
> Untested patch that fixes this testcase.
Thanks. This f
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 19:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=18151)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18151&action=view)
gcc44-pr40668.patch
Untested patch that fixes this testcase. I believe my commit was correct, but
apparently it
--- Comment #4 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-07 16:28 ---
A reghunt identified Jakub's (added to cc: list) r142481 (PR38367 fix) as the
source of this regression.
--
mikpe at it dot uu dot se changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-07 11:35 ---
Confirmed, with gcc-4.3-20090705 it works, with gcc-4.4-20090630 it fails.
Compiling with -S and comparing the .s files it looks like 4.4 completely
mis-schedules the code for put_uint32:
put_uint32:
.register
--- Comment #2 from blp at cs dot stanford dot edu 2009-07-07 05:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=18148)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18148&action=view)
test program (before preprocessing)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40668
--- Comment #1 from blp at cs dot stanford dot edu 2009-07-07 05:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=18147)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18147&action=view)
preprocessed test input
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40668
11 matches
Mail list logo