http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40419
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40419
Meador Inge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meadori at codesourcery dot
--- Comment #4 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2010-06-05 11:44
---
richard,
the reason that i went into such details about my port in (2) was to get the
reinit_regs issue out in a place so that if someone decided to take on this
beast, they had all of the issues in front of them
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-05 07:27
---
Kenny, I too don't like target_reinit, and FWIW
I fought the same battle before the patch was submitted.
The argument then, and I suspect the argument now,
is that although the function is horribly inefficient,
it
--- Comment #2 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2010-06-04 17:18
---
I would just like to say that i think that target_reinit should be removed.
It is nothing but trouble. We tried to use it on our private port and it was
very slow and most of the time ended up crashing. Furth
--- Comment #1 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-11 21:29 ---
Adding Richard and Sandra to the CC list.
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
