https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to coypu from comment #16)
> well, the workaround only works for x86 and powerpc.
> Other archs are not calling SUBTARGET_INIT_BUILTINS.
> I'm not sure whether that should be grounds for keeping the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
coypu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||coypu at sdf dot org
--- Comment #16 from coypu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
--- Comment #14 from Krister Walfridsson ---
Author: kristerw
Date: Fri Sep 29 09:38:08 2017
New Revision: 253283
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253283&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-29 Krister Walfridsson
Backport from mainlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
--- Comment #13 from Krister Walfridsson ---
Author: kristerw
Date: Tue Sep 26 21:26:21 2017
New Revision: 253216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253216&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-26 Krister Walfridsson
PR target/39570
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
Kai-Uwe Eckhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kuehro at gmx dot de
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cato at df dot lth.se
--- Comment #11 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
--- Comment #9 from aran at 100acres dot us 2009-03-28 19:38 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Symbol versioning, obviously.
>
Yep, that would have worked. Thanks for the clue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-28 18:30 ---
Symbol versioning, obviously.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
--- Comment #7 from aran at 100acres dot us 2009-03-28 18:13 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Another fix is to #undef TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS as obviously netbsd is another
> OS without a clue ...
>
Please explain how an OS with a clue would handle this problem. Older binaries
that use th
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-28 13:09
---
Switch component to "target", as this is target-specific behaviour not specific
to fortran (you'd have the same thing with C if you use __builtin_cabs() and
__builtin_cabsf().
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot o
13 matches
Mail list logo
