http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin 2012-12-11
23:40:34 UTC ---
Still see these on my arm box. glibc is now somewhat old.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-12/msg00871.html
Box has a Marvell processor.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-24
07:18:33 UTC ---
I don't see the failures on arm-linux-gnueabi but do on powerpc64-linux-gnu; I
wonder if this is a related bug.
--- Comment #4 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-20 19:22 ---
Ah - hang on a minute . What binutils are you building with ? Can you try with
a more recent binutils ?
cheers
Ramana
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfir
--- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-05-13
15:16 ---
Subject: Re: Various cleanup tests fail
> I don't see these failing with trunk as of 147209 or on an
> arm-none-linux-gnueabi 4.4.x on the testresults mailing list. Do these still
> fail for your tester?
--- Comment #2 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-13 14:39 ---
I don't see these failing with trunk as of 147209 or on an
arm-none-linux-gnueabi 4.4.x on the testresults mailing list. Do these still
fail for your tester?
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
W
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-19 16:06 ---
(gdb) p i
$6 = 4
(gdb) p/x mask
$8 = 0x4ff0
(gdb) p/x ((phase1_vrs *)context)->core.r
$11 = {0x0, 0x0, 0xe, 0x817, 0x0, 0x0, 0xbee108d4, 0x0, 0x0, 0x861c, 0x0,
0x84bc, 0x0, 0x1c, 0x0, 0x40025000}
R_SP is 13. So,
