--- Comment #20 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-06-13 00:10
---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFI
--- Comment #19 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 12:54 ---
Subject: Bug 39146
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 12 12:54:30 2009
New Revision: 148428
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148428
Log:
gcc/
2009-06-12 Joey Ye
PR middle-end/39146
* c
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 18:33
---
Stop setting the target milestone unless it is a regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #17 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-03-03 17:36
---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00159.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #16 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-03 17:14 ---
Subject: Bug 39146
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Mar 3 17:14:04 2009
New Revision: 144577
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144577
Log:
2009-03-03 Joey Ye
H.J. Lu
PR middle-end/3
--- Comment #15 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-02-28 21:43
---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Created an attachment (id=17305)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17305&action=view) [edit]
> > New patch attached
> >
> > Test finished
--- Comment #14 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-02-28 18:51
---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Created an attachment (id=17305)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17305&action=view) [edit]
> New patch attached
>
> Test finished. No regression with emx_avx_sim. Wa
--- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-21 00:01 ---
Subject: Bug 39146
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Feb 21 00:00:49 2009
New Revision: 144338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144338
Log:
2009-02-20 Joey Ye
PR middle-end/39146
* cfgexpa
--- Comment #12 from Joey dot ye at intel dot com 2009-02-16 08:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=17305)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17305&action=view)
New patch attached
Test finished. No regression with emx_avx_sim. Wait to checkin to 4.5
--
Joey dot ye at i
--- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-02-12 15:42
---
I think we can consider it for 4.5.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #10 from Joey dot ye at intel dot com 2009-02-12 15:20 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> We still have push and mov. I guess it may be the best we can do.
> But please run full 32 and 64bit testsuite with your patch as well
> as under emx-avx-sim.
full 32/64 bit test pass with n
--- Comment #9 from Joey dot ye at intel dot com 2009-02-12 02:40 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> We still have push and mov. I guess it may be the best we can do.
I believe so too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39146
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-02-12 02:33 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created an attachment (id=17283)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17283&action=view) [edit]
> A patch to fix this problem
>
> Impact to other test unknown. Test undergoi
--- Comment #7 from Joey dot ye at intel dot com 2009-02-12 02:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=17283)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17283&action=view)
A patch to fix this problem
Impact to other test unknown. Test undergoing.
HJ, can you also help to verify and t
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-02-12 01:58 ---
locate_and_pad_parm in function.c has
/* Remember if the outgoing parameter requires extra alignment on the
calling function side. */
if (crtl->stack_alignment_needed < boundary)
crtl->stack_alignment_
--- Comment #5 from Joey dot ye at intel dot com 2009-02-12 01:45 ---
Stack realign is finalized by
stack_realign = (incoming_stack_boundary
< (current_function_is_leaf
? crtl->max_used_stack_slot_alignment
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-02-11 23:59 ---
The dynamic stack alignment may not be easy to optimize out.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39146
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-02-11 16:53 ---
Also expand_one_var in cfgexpand.c has
if (crtl->stack_alignment_estimated < align)
{
/* stack_alignment_estimated shouldn't change after stack
realign decision made */
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-02-11 15:15 ---
This is caused by assign_parms in function.c:
/* Estimate stack alignment from parameter alignment. */
if (SUPPORTS_STACK_ALIGNMENT)
{
unsigned int align = FUNCTION_ARG_BOUNDARY (data.
--- Comment #1 from Joey dot ye at intel dot com 2009-02-10 05:35 ---
Argument need 32 bytes alignment, No way to guarantee the argument won't be
spilled. That's why stack adjustment is there.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39146
20 matches
Mail list logo
