--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 14:33 ---
Subject: Bug 39065
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Sep 4 14:33:16 2009
New Revision: 151423
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151423
Log:
2009-09-04 Ozkan Sezer
PR target/39065
* configur
--- Comment #7 from sezeroz at gmail dot com 2009-09-04 06:26 ---
fixed on the trunk now.
--
sezeroz at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-03 16:46 ---
Subject: Bug 39065
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Sep 3 16:46:00 2009
New Revision: 151386
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151386
Log:
2009-09-03 Ozkan Sezer
PR target/39065
* configur
--- Comment #5 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2009-03-14 15:57 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00640.html
--
nightstrike at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #4 from sezeroz at gmail dot com 2009-02-21 08:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=17337)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17337&action=view)
intptr_t type check patch for libiberty configure
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39065
--- Comment #3 from sezeroz at gmail dot com 2009-02-02 22:59 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> You should put the new code in a #ifdef HAVE_STDINT and use the old code
> otherwise. Else, any platforms without stdint.h would not compile.
>
I would do that and it would be easy, but then o
--- Comment #2 from dj at redhat dot com 2009-02-02 21:52 ---
You should put the new code in a #ifdef HAVE_STDINT and use the old code
otherwise. Else, any platforms without stdint.h would not compile.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39065
--- Comment #1 from sezeroz at gmail dot com 2009-02-01 17:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=17224)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17224&action=view)
libiberty hashtab.c intptr_t fix
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39065
