[Bug target/37668] Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG:

2008-12-10 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 15:00 --- Fixed in 4.4.0 -- rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug target/37668] Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG:

2008-12-10 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 14:58 --- Subject: Bug 37668 Author: rearnsha Date: Wed Dec 10 14:57:18 2008 New Revision: 142647 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142647 Log: Martin Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR target/37668 * arm.c (ar

[Bug target/37668] Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG:

2008-12-10 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug target/37668] Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG:

2008-09-28 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-28 11:57 --- Don't know if the patch is OK, but the code is obviously doing something silly. CC-ing ARM maintainer. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/37668] Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG:

2008-09-28 Thread martinwguy at yahoo dot it
--- Comment #1 from martinwguy at yahoo dot it 2008-09-28 09:55 --- Created an attachment (id=16418) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16418&action=view) Aplies the "obvious" fix -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37668